77 Bloor Street West, Suite 600  Toronto, Ontario  M5S 1M2

416 489 8890  steve@benmor.com

Why Wealthier Clients Are Turning to ADR in Family Law

By Leanne Townsend | - September 15, 2025

Leanne Townsend is a Senior Divorce Lawyer at Benmor Family Law Group with over 25 years of courtroom experience and expertise in family law, divorce, and domestic violence. She holds degrees from the University of Toronto and the University of Western Ontario and has served in prominent roles, including 16 years as an Assistant Crown Attorney and as the founder of Townsend Family Law. A skilled communicator, negotiator, and litigator, Leanne is committed to empowering her clients and achieving optimal outcomes both inside and outside the courtroom. A sought-after coach, speaker, and media contributor, she hosts the popular "Divorcing Well" and "Divorce Explained" podcasts and recently joined Fanshawe College as a part-time professor. Beyond her legal career, she is passionate about fitness, travel, and lifelong learning and takes pride in her two children.

When people think of high-net-worth divorce, they often imagine high-stakes court battles, aggressive lawyers, and long, expensive trials. But in reality, many wealthier clients are intentionally avoiding litigation altogether—and turning instead to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods like mediation, arbitration, or collaborative divorce.

So, why the shift?

1. Privacy and Discretion

Court proceedings are public. For high-profile or affluent individuals, this means intimate details of their finances, relationships, and personal lives can become part of the public record. ADR provides a much-needed level of confidentiality. The entire process is kept behind closed doors, which is especially appealing to business owners, executives, and public figures who want to protect their reputations and privacy.

2. Cost-Effectiveness (Yes, Even for the Wealthy)

Litigation can drag on for months—sometimes years—running up hundreds of thousands in legal fees. While ADR isn’t cheap, it is often significantly more cost-effective than going to trial. Wealthier clients are savvy: they want value for their money. They know that even with ample resources, a protracted court battle rarely leads to a better result.

3. Control Over the Process

ADR puts more control in the hands of the clients. Rather than having a judge impose decisions, parties work collaboratively (with guidance) to craft agreements tailored to their needs and those of their children. For entrepreneurs or professionals used to being in the driver’s seat, this level of autonomy can be a relief.

4. Preserving Relationships (Especially Where Children Are Involved)

Many affluent families are dual-income, with both parties contributing in complex ways—financially and otherwise. ADR promotes communication, cooperation, and solutions that work long-term. This is particularly valuable when there are children involved and a continued co-parenting relationship is necessary. The less adversarial the process, the healthier the post-divorce family dynamic.

5. Customized Solutions

High-net-worth individuals often have complicated asset portfolios—business interests, real estate, international holdings, trusts. ADR allows for creative, flexible solutions that courts simply don’t have the time or resources to craft. Mediation or collaborative law gives parties the opportunity to work with financial experts and family lawyers to come up with tailored resolutions.

The Bottom Line

Wealthier clients aren’t turning to ADR because they’re afraid of court. They’re doing it because it’s smarter. It protects their privacy, minimizes emotional damage, preserves their wealth, and gives them a say in the outcome. As a senior family lawyer who works with clients from all walks of life, I’ve seen firsthand how ADR leads to more dignified, sustainable resolutions—especially when there’s a lot at stake.

If you’re navigating divorce or separation and want a solution that’s strategic and respectful, ADR may be the best path forward.

Share this article on: