77 Bloor Street West, Suite 600 Toronto, Ontario M5S 1M2
| April 11, 2018
The good news is that most dentists have established a successful dental practice with a significant portfolio of patients and a regular stream of income. In business terms, this means... Continue Reading...
| May 12, 2016
That was the conclusion that Justice Marvin Kurz reached in the case of Torabi v. Patterson, 2016 ONCJ 210 (CanLII) dealing with whether 4 year old Dylan could maintain a... Continue Reading...
| July 5, 2017
Litigation is an adversarial process that is used to arrive at the truth. A court case is a contest between two parties. Each party marshals evidence in support of his... Continue Reading...
| February 15, 2016
No two divorces are the same. Some are simple, others more complex. Nothing can be more complex than attempting to resolve the financial fallout of the high net worth couple... Continue Reading...
| August 3, 2016
Family court judges are called on daily to make difficult decisions. The more challenging of cases often involve custody, relocation, alienation and termination of contact. However, at the far extreme... Continue Reading...
| January 10, 2017
If there ever was a time when the public had unlimited access to the courts, that time has come to an end. In Greco-Wang v. Wang [2014] O.J. No. 4319,... Continue Reading...
| March 6, 2017
The Carrigan family’s tour of the courts took them to 2 trials, to the Court of Appeal, to Divisional Court, and to the Supreme Court of Canada, where leave to... Continue Reading...
| December 2, 2016
In Grenon v. Canada [2014] T.C.J. No. 227, the payer of child support appealed a notice of reassessment denying a tax deduction for the legal fees he paid resulting from... Continue Reading...
| February 6, 2018
The case of Valettas v. Chrissanthakopoulos [2014] O.J. No. 4835 is a reminder of the clients we serve and how anger, hurt and distrust can cause irreparable damage to everyone... Continue Reading...
| January 9, 2018
Once upon a time, photographs, video and audio recordings were introduced as evidence to impeach a witness or prove a point. Lawyers would order surveillance to support their client’s theory... Continue Reading...